Annie Hassell and co-workers at Glaxo Smithkline have had lots of success using the Hampton Research Crystal Screens (HRCS) 1 & 2 as additives. Sometimes these improve the crystal quality whereas the 96 Additive Screen does not. What they have not had a great deal of success with is determining which component of the added reagent is responsible for improving the crystal quality. Does not appear that it is just one component in many cases.

They generally use 5% of the sparse matrix screen added to the well. When they get a hit, they further optimize the concentration of the reagent to add to the well.

ARCHIVE: Introduction, Pre-crystallization, Crystallization, Post-crystallization, Derivatization, Cryoprotection, Diffraction, Symmetry, Structure Solution, Structure Refinement, Structure Analysis & Presentation.

TOPIC DISCUSSION - Test Set and R-free

Editor: Please share your practice and theory on Test Set and R-free with fellow members of the group. A list of suggested subtopics is shown below. 

(1) How many reflections do you put in Test Set for R-free calculations, a centerin percentage or a certain number?

(2) For isomorphous structures, such as a wild type and several mutant structures crystallized in the same lattice, do you use the same Test Set for all these structures?

(3) Do you use the same Test Set if you re-process your data during refinement or obtain a better data set?

(4) Do you use the same Test Set when you switch refinement programs?

(5) What do you do to the Test Set if you find out the crystal is twinned during refinement without twinning considerations?

(6) Do you include some or all data in the Test Set for the final rounds of refinement?

      
Mark Mayer: How about an addition?

(7) When you have NCS do you pick Test Set using thin shells?

Editor: Recommended Reading: CCP4 wiki: R-factors

Xinhua Ji: The more complete the data, the more accurate the stucture. It appears that R-free should be used to monitor initial refinement only. Once the model is completed and refinement is converged, all data should be included for final refinement. Besides, refinement with all data is likely to reveal additional features. However, the modern ML refinement targets require the use of test set and R-free is mandatory. Any ideas?

Phenix.refine allows one to set the maximal number of reflections in the test set. I usually set this number at 1000 using the command line shown below.

refinement.input.xray_data.r_free_flags.max_free=1000

At lower resolution, the program selects a default number (<1000) of test-set reflections. At higher resolution, when the default number of reflections is greater than 1000, 1000 reflections will be selected.

I discussed the "Test Set of 1000 or fewer Reflections" with Dr. Paul Adams during the recent Mid-Atlantic Macromolecular Crystallogrophy Meeting and we agreed on this.

ARCHIVE: Twinning, Low Resolution Crystallography, PHASER, HKL2000, Parallel Expression, Structural Genomics, NCS, Missing Atoms, Trends in Crystallography,  Absorption Correction.

Part 1: "How to read international tables?"

Part 2: "Data collection strategy" and "Twinning"

           "Phasing methods - a general introduction to all methods"

Part 3: "SAD phasing, Quick halide soaking, and Radiation damage 

           with possible use of it for phasing"