|
Newsletter 130 September 11, 2006 |
The
NIH X-Ray Diffraction
Interest Group
Newsletter
web site: http://mcl1.ncifcrf.gov/nihxray
|
The 2006 International Conference on Structural Genomics Advances in Protein Crystallography
Item 1: August 2006 Publications by
Members: 1: Esser L, Gong X, Yang S, Yu L, Yu CA, Xia D. Item 2: Tips and Tricks - Crystallization Editorial - The Silver Bullets:
At the ACA 2006, Bob Cudney (Hampton Research) and Alexander McPherson
(University of California Irvine) presented an alternative stretage for
crystallizing macromolecules, as they put it, by searching the silver
bullets. Examples of the silver bullets incude hexammine cobalt (III)
chloride, 1,3-propanediol, sebacic acid, 4-aminobezonic acid,
terephthalic acid, arginine, pentaglycine, glycerol 2-phosphate,
trans-aconitic acid, trimesic acid, and putrescine. As you may realize,
they are in fact additives. They tested 120 additives in the
crystallization experiment of 81 proteins using two fundamental
conditions: (1) 30% w/v PEG 3350, 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.0; and (2) 50%
TacsimateTM pH 7.0. The succesful rate was very impressive:
65 out of 81 (85%) proteins crystallized. Most significant was that 35
of the 65 (54%) crystallized only in the presence of one or more
reagent mixes, but not in control samples lacking any additives!
As crystallographers zest for larger and
larger molecular machinery (spoiled public is part to blame), what used
to be a novelty: crystallization of protein-protein complexes, has
indeed become a way of life for most of us. Like everyone else, our lab
often struggles to obtain that elusive crystal of so-and-so complex.
Over the years, it became clear to us that protein complexes often
favored certain conditions of crystallizations. Although they were
not as well defined as DNA-protein complex crystallizations, these
conditions appeared more narrowly distributed than those for general
soluble proteins. This lead us to conduct a survey on
protein-protein complex crystallizations a few years ago, which
resulted in a 48-condition sparse matrix screening kit. More recently,
we revisited the survey using a much larger database of published
structures and expanded the initial 48-condition to a 96-condition
sparse matrix kit (Radaev, Li, and Sun, Acta Cryst. D62:605-612).
Click for Introduction and tips and tricks in Crystallization, Post-crystallization treatments for improving diffraction quality of protein crystals, Derivatization, Diffraction, Symmetry, Structure Solution, Structure Refinement, and Structure Analysis.
Item 3: Topic Discussion - Low Resolution Crystallography Byron DeLaBarre & Axel Brunger: Considerations for the refinement of low-resolution crystal structures Click for previous discussions on: PHASER, HKL2000, Parallel Protein Expression, Structural Genomics, NCS, Missing Atoms, Trends in Crystallography, and Absorption Correction.
Item 4: Dr. Zbigniew Dauter's Lectures at the NIH (03/29-31/2005) |
|
This site is maintained by Dr. Xinhua Ji (jix@ncifcrf.gov) on the NCI-CCR-MCL server (http://mcl1.ncifcrf.gov). |