Order this document
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998 Oct;42(10):2637-44
Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, California 92121, USA.
[Medline record in process]
Nelfinavir mesylate (formerly AG1343) is a potent and selective inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease approved for the treatment of individuals infected with HIV. Nucleotide sequence analysis of protease genes from plasma HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA revealed a unique aspartic acid (D)-to-asparagine (N) substitution at residue 30 (D30N) in 25 of 55 patients treated with nelfinavir for a median of 13 weeks. Although the appearance of D30N was occasionally associated with concurrent or sequential emergence of other changes (e.g., at residues 35, 36, 46, 71, 77, and 88), genotypic changes associated with phenotypic resistance to other protease inhibitors were not observed (e.g., at residues 48, 50, 82, and 84) or were only rarely observed (e.g., at residue 90). In phenotypic assays, viral isolates with high-level resistance to nelfinavir remained susceptible to indinavir, saquinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir (formerly VX-478/141W94). Similar results were observed in phenotypic assays utilizing HIV-1 NL4-3, which contained the D30N substitution alone or in combination with substitutions at other residues (e.g., residues 46, 71, and 88). These data indicate that the initial pathway of resistance to nelfinavir is unique and suggest that individuals failing short courses of nelfinavir-containing regimens may respond to regimens containing other protease inhibitors.
PMID: 9756769, UI: 98443459
Other Formats: Links:
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998 Sep;42(9):2153-9
Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology Albany Medical College, Albany, New York 12208, USA. GLDrusano@AOL.com
The use of combinations of anti-human immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV) agents targeted to different molecular targets will most likely result in increased viral suppression and may also delay or prevent the emergence of resistant HIV strains. The purpose of the present study was to develop information on the in vitro anti-HIV activities of combinations of the reverse transcriptase inhibitor 1592U89 and the protease inhibitor 141W94 to help guide the choice of dosages in clinical trials. Triplicate in vitro dose-response matrices were prepared with MT-2 cells infected with HIV type 1 (HIV-1) strain IIIB. In order to account for the effects of protein binding, tissue culture medium with 10% fetal bovine serum was supplemented with the human serum proteins alpha1 acid glycoprotein (1 mg/ml) and albumin (40 mg/ml). The three-dimensional drug interaction surface for 1592U89 and 141W94 was constructed with the program MacSynergy II. As analyzed relative to a Bliss Independence null reference model, this combination was synergistic, with volumes of synergy exceeding 100 (99% confidence). Analysis of the data set with a fully parametric form of an equation for the quantitation of drug interaction developed by Greco et al. (W. R. Greco, G. Bravo, and J. C. Parsons, Pharmacol. Rev. 47:331-385, 1995) resulted in an interaction term statistically significantly greater than 0.0, indicating true synergy. Both methods concur that this combination is significantly synergistic. These data, with favorable findings from phase I/II trials for each drug alone, suggest that the combination of 1592U89 plus 141W94 should be further evaluated in clinical trials.
MeSH Terms:
Substances:
Grant support:
Drugs 1998 Jun;55(6):837-42; discussion 843-4
Adis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Amprenavir is a viral protease inhibitor with specificity for the HIV protease enzyme. The resistance profile of amprenavir appears to differ from that of other protease inhibitors such as saquinavir and indinavir. Twelve hours after single-dose administration of amprenavir 1200mg to HIV-infected individuals, the mean plasma concentration of the drug was more than 10-fold greater than the 50% inhibitory concentration for HIV-1IIIB in peripheral blood lymphocytes. In a small nonblind study, amprenavir monotherapy increased CD4+ cell count and decreased viral load in 37 patients with HIV infection and no previous exposure to protease inhibitor therapy. Combination therapy comprising amprenavir and other antiretroviral agents (abacavir, zidovudine, lamivudine, indinavir, saquinavir or nelfinavir) decreased viral load and increased CD4+ cell counts in patients with HIV infection. Antiviral efficacy was maintained during up to 24 weeks' follow-up. Available data suggest that rash, headache and diarrhoea or loose stools are the most frequent adverse events associated with amprenavir therapy.
Publication Types:
Adv Exp Med Biol 1998;436:75-83
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
VX-478 (141W94), a potent inhibitor of HIV protease, is in late stage clinical trials for the treatment of HIV infection and AIDS. Resistant viruses were raised in vitro by passage of HIV-1IIIB in the presence of increasing concentrations of VX-478 and the related hydroxyethylamino sulfonamide inhibitor VB-11,328. By direct PCR analysis of selected viruses, a number of mutations were identified (L10F, M46I, I47V, I50V and I84V) in the protease gene. These mutations were introduced into recombinant HIV-1 protease and the mutant enzymes assayed against a panel of inhibitors of diverse chemical structure. For VX-478, significant increases in IC90 and Ki were observed for virus or protease, respectively, containing I50V single mutation or an M46I/I47V/I50V triple mutation. The mutant proteases were also characterized for their kinetic competence to process substrates representing cleavage sites of gag-pol viral polypeptide. The kinetic data were interpreted with the aid of molecular modeling to understand the effect of mutations on inhibitor binding and processing of the gag-pol polypeptide to generate infective virions.
J Pharm Sci 1998 Mar;87(3):306-10
Department of Pharmaceutics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, Connecticut 06877, USA.
To combat infection and inhibit viral replication of HIV in the brain, antiretroviral agents must cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). An in vitro BBB model consisting of bovine brain microvessel endothelial cells grown on porous filters was used to study and compare the transport of nevirapine, a potent and selective nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, with other HIV antiretroviral agents currently in use for the treatment of HIV infection. These included nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (didanosine, stavudine, zalcitabine, zidovudine), a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase (delaviridine), and protease inhibitors (indinavir, saquinavir, VX-478). Nevirapine was the most permeable antiretroviral agent studied in the BBB model. The order of in vitro BBB permeability was nevirapine >> VX-478 > didanosine, stavudine, zalcitabine, zidovudine > indinavir > saquinavir. There was an apparent bell-shaped relationship between in vitro BBB permeability and octanol/phosphate-buffered saline distribution coefficient (D) where all lipophilic (log D > 2.5) as well as hydrophilic (log D < -0.5) antiretrovirals were less permeable than nevirapine (log D = 1.8). There were no significant effects on the in vitro BBB permeability of nevirapine in combination with other antiretroviral agents. Saquinavir was the only drug shown to have an affinity for the P-glycoprotein efflux pump, which may have contributed to its very low permeability. The apparent ability of nevirapine to readily permeate the BBB and enter the brain, where it may inhibit replication of HIV, potentially increases its therapeutic value.
J Infect Dis 1997 May;175(5):1063-70
CIBA-GEIGY Ltd., Pharmaceutical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Protein binding can impair the potency of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors. Therefore, the activity of a novel compound, CGP 61755, was studied in the absence or presence of alpha1-acid glycoprotein (alpha1AGP). In MT-2 cells, the activity loss was 4-fold (EC90 without alpha1AGP, 29 nM vs. 122 nM with alpha1AGP). In primary lymphocytes, the loss was 8-fold (EC90, 45 nM vs. 364 nM). In identical experiments, the activity loss in MT-2 cells and lymphocytes was 2- and 3-fold, respectively, for indinavir, 11- and 10-fold for saquinavir, and 11- and 48-fold for ritonavir. For SC-52151, a 17-fold loss was seen in MT-2 cells, whereas no EC90 with alpha1AGP was reached in lymphocytes. This study demonstrates that the impact of alpha1AGP on in vitro activity varies greatly among different HIV protease inhibitors. The magnitude of such differences is greater in human lymphocytes than in a standard cell line.
Clin Pharmacokinet 1997 Mar;32(3):194-209
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, England.
Since its introduction in 1987, zidovudine monotherapy has been the treatment of choice for patients with HIV infection. Unfortunately it has been established that the beneficial effects of zidovudine are not sustained due to the development of resistant viral strains. This has led to the strategy of combination therapy, and in 1995 treatment with zidovudine plus didanosine, or zidovudine plus zalcitabine, was demonstrated to be more effective than zidovudine monotherapy in preventing disease progression and reducing mortality in patients with HIV disease. Recent work demonstrates an even greater antiviral effect from triple therapy with 2 nucleosides, zidovudine plus zalcitabine with the addition of saquinavir, a new protease inhibitor drug. The HIV protease enzyme is responsible for the post-translational processing of gag and gag-pol polyprotein precursors, and its inhibition by drugs such as saquinavir, ritonavir, indinavir and VX-478 results in the production of non-infectious virions. As resistance may also develop to the protease inhibitors they may be used in combination, and future strategies may well include quadruple therapy with 2 nucleoside analogues plus 2 protease inhibitors. Administration of protease inhibitors alone or in combination with other drugs does raise a number of important pharmacokinetic issues for patients with HIV disease. Some protease inhibitors (e.g. saquinavir) have kinetic profiles characterised by reduced absorption and a high first pass effect, resulting in poor bioavailability which may be improved by administrating with food. Physiological factors including achlorhydria, malabsorption and hepatic dysfunction may influence the bioavailability of protease inhibitors in HIV disease. Protease inhibitors are very highly bound to plasma proteins (> 98%), predominantly to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. This may influence their antiviral activity in vitro and may also predispose to plasma protein displacement interactions. Such interactions are usually only of clinical relevance if the metabolism of the displaced drug is also inhibited. This is precisely the situation likely to pertain to the protease inhibitors, as ritonavir may displace other protease inhibitor drugs, such as saquinavir, from plasma proteins and inhibit their metabolism. Protease inhibitors are extensively metabolised by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes present in the liver and small intestine. In vitro studies suggest that the most influential CYP isoenzyme involved in the metabolism of the protease inhibitors is CYP3A, with the isoforms CYP2C9 and CYP2D6 also contributing. Ritonavir has an elimination half-life (t1/2 beta) of 3 hours, indinavir 2 hours and saquinavir between 7 and 12 hours. Renal elimination is not significant, with less than 5% of ritonavir and saquinavir excreted in the unchanged form. As patients with HIV disease are likely to be taking multiple prolonged drug regimens this may lead to drug interactions as a result of enzyme induction or inhibition. Recognised enzyme inducers of CYP3A, which are likely to be prescribed for patients with HIV disease, include rifampicin (rifampin) [treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis], rifabutin (treatment and prophylaxis of Mycobacterium avium complex), phenobarbital (phenobarbitone), phenytoin and carbamazepine (treatment of seizures secondary to cerebral toxoplasmosis or cerebral lymphoma). These drugs may reduce the plasma concentrations of the protease inhibitors and reduce their antiviral efficacy. If coadministered drugs are substrates for a common CYP enzyme, the elimination of one or both drugs may be impaired. Drugs which are metabolised by CYP3A and are likely to be used in the treatment of patients with HIV disease include the azole antifungals, macrolide antibiotics and dapsone; therefore, protease inhibitors may interact with these drugs.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997 Mar;41(3):654-60
Department of Infectious Diseases Research, Abbott Laboratories, Illinois 60064, USA. Dale.J.Kempf@abbott.com
Coadministration with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitor ritonavir was investigated as a method for enhancing the levels of other peptidomimetic HIV protease inhibitors in plasma. In rat and human liver microsomes, ritonavir potently inhibited the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated metabolism of saquinavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, and VX-478. The structural features of ritonavir responsible for CYP binding and inhibition were examined. Coadministration of other protease inhibitors with ritonavir in rats and dogs produced elevated and sustained plasma drug levels 8 to 12 h after a single dose. Drug exposure in rats was elevated by 8- to 46-fold. A > 50-fold enhancement of the concentrations of saquinavir in plasma was observed in humans following a single codose of ritonavir (600 mg) and saquinavir (200 mg). These results indicate that ritonavir can favorably alter the pharmacokinetic profiles of other protease inhibitors. Combination regimens of ritonavir and other protease inhibitors may thus play a role in the treatment of HIV infection. Because of potentially substantial drug level increases, however, such combinations require further investigation to establish safe regimens for clinical use.
J Biol Chem 1996 Dec 27;271(52):33231-5
Department of Virology, Glaxo Wellcome, Stevenage SG1 2NY, United Kingdom.
Mutations in the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease (L90M, G48V, and L90M/G48V) arise when HIV is passaged in the presence of the HIV protease inhibitor saquinavir. These mutations yield a virus with less sensitivity to the drug (L90M > G48V >> L90M/G48V). L90M, G48V, and L90M/G48V proteases have 1/20, 1/160, and 1/1000 the affinity for saquinavir compared to WT protease, respectively. Therefore, the affinity of mutant protease for saquinavir decreased as the sensitivity of the virus to saquinavir decreased. Association rate constants for WT and mutant proteases with saquinavir were similar, ranging from 2 to 4 x 10(7) M-1 s-1. In contrast, the dissociation rate constants for WT, L90M, G48V, and L90M/G48V proteases complexed with saquinavir were 0.0014, 0.019, 0.128, and 0. 54 s-1, respectively. This indicated that the reduced affinity for mutant proteases and saquinavir is primarily the result of larger dissociation rate constants. The increased dissociation rate constants may be the result of a decrease in the internal equilibrium between the bound inhibitor with the protease flaps up and the bound inhibitor with the flaps down. Interestingly, the affinity of these mutant proteases for VX-478, ABT-538, AG-1343, or L-735,524 was not reduced as much as that for saquinavir. Finally, the catalytic constants of WT and mutant proteases were determined for eight small peptide substrates that mimic the viral cleavage sites in vivo. WT and L90M proteases had similar catalytic constants for these substrates. In contrast, G48V and L90M/G48V proteases had catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) values with TLNF-PISP, RKIL-FLDG, and AETF-YVDG that were 1/10 to 1/20 the value of WT protease. The decreased catalytic efficiencies were primarily the result of increased Km values. Thus, mutations in the protease decrease the affinity of the enzyme for saquinavir and the catalytic efficiency with peptide substrates.